<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How can we take time out to help people get in?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.melchua.com/2008/08/07/how-can-we-take-time-out-to-help-people-get-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2008/08/07/how-can-we-take-time-out-to-help-people-get-in/</link>
	<description>Braindump of the Mel. Seek coherency and relevance at your own risk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dwins</title>
		<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2008/08/07/how-can-we-take-time-out-to-help-people-get-in/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>dwins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.melchua.com/2008/08/07/how-can-we-take-time-out-to-help-people-get-in/#comment-894</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is an interesting take on that post.  You seem to think of &quot;flow&quot; as a more consistent state (something I would call &quot;competence and familiarity&quot;), whereas most of the sources I&#039;ve seen on the topic describe &quot;flow&quot; more as a temporary, almost meditative state.  I don&#039;t think that either definition really precludes communication within a project, just that there is a danger in the attitude that leads to statements like &quot;don&#039;t bother me, I&#039;m getting Stuff done.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is an interesting take on that post.  You seem to think of &#8220;flow&#8221; as a more consistent state (something I would call &#8220;competence and familiarity&#8221;), whereas most of the sources I&#8217;ve seen on the topic describe &#8220;flow&#8221; more as a temporary, almost meditative state.  I don&#8217;t think that either definition really precludes communication within a project, just that there is a danger in the attitude that leads to statements like &#8220;don&#8217;t bother me, I&#8217;m getting Stuff done.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
