<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going away to come back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/26/going-away-to-come-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/26/going-away-to-come-back/</link>
	<description>Braindumps on things Mel Chua has found shiny lately.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/26/going-away-to-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/26/going-away-to-come-back/#comment-654</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say much about the Windows/OLPC rumors; as a volunteer, I don&#039;t have any secret inside information (and I don&#039;t think there&#039;s all that much in the way of secret inside information in the first place - just some very active, speculative rumor mills... remember, FUD is sensational and consequently spreads fast).

I will say that a large number of volunteer developers, (and volunteer developers vastly outnumber OLPC staff) are committed to keeping their work for the XO open-source, and nothing can take away the open-sourceness of the code that&#039;s currently running - and working - on the machines. So there&#039;s no concern in my mind whatsoever that we&#039;ll ever be locked in to using &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; Windows on the XO. In any case, I believe that a truly open platform is also open to closed software. As long as &lt;em&gt;our&lt;/em&gt; freedom to create and control the software on our machines is unrestricted, I don&#039;t have a problem with it.

These are all my personal thoughts and opinions, and I don&#039;t speak for or represent anyone but myself. I certainly don&#039;t pretend to know anything on this subject that isn&#039;t already available to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say much about the Windows/OLPC rumors; as a volunteer, I don&#8217;t have any secret inside information (and I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s all that much in the way of secret inside information in the first place &#8211; just some very active, speculative rumor mills&#8230; remember, FUD is sensational and consequently spreads fast).</p>
<p>I will say that a large number of volunteer developers, (and volunteer developers vastly outnumber OLPC staff) are committed to keeping their work for the XO open-source, and nothing can take away the open-sourceness of the code that&#8217;s currently running &#8211; and working &#8211; on the machines. So there&#8217;s no concern in my mind whatsoever that we&#8217;ll ever be locked in to using <em>only</em> Windows on the XO. In any case, I believe that a truly open platform is also open to closed software. As long as <em>our</em> freedom to create and control the software on our machines is unrestricted, I don&#8217;t have a problem with it.</p>
<p>These are all my personal thoughts and opinions, and I don&#8217;t speak for or represent anyone but myself. I certainly don&#8217;t pretend to know anything on this subject that isn&#8217;t already available to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some guy</title>
		<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/26/going-away-to-come-back/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Some guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/26/going-away-to-come-back/#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Can you please comment on the reported switch to Windows for the OLPC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please comment on the reported switch to Windows for the OLPC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

