<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Various and sundry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/11/various-and-sundry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/11/various-and-sundry/</link>
	<description>Braindumps on things Mel Chua has found shiny lately.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Kuper</title>
		<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/11/various-and-sundry/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Kuper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/11/various-and-sundry/#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Hearty congrats on Story Jam; my symapthy for the rest, except this bit: &quot;I would rather have friends and colleagues than admirers.&quot;

While you don&#039;t explicitly state that the two categories - friends/colleages vs. admirers - are disjoint, your wording suggests to me you might - subconsciously, perhaps - sometimes think they are.

If so, fiddlesticks! There&#039;s little harm in admiring your friends or colleagues or in them admiring you, as long as it doesn&#039;t get out of hand. Uncritical admiration is foolhardy, but the kind of admiration we feel for someone who&#039;s doing things we think are worth doing is healthy, and can strengthen - rather than weaken - personal and professional relationships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hearty congrats on Story Jam; my symapthy for the rest, except this bit: &#8220;I would rather have friends and colleagues than admirers.&#8221;</p>
<p>While you don&#8217;t explicitly state that the two categories &#8211; friends/colleages vs. admirers &#8211; are disjoint, your wording suggests to me you might &#8211; subconsciously, perhaps &#8211; sometimes think they are.</p>
<p>If so, fiddlesticks! There&#8217;s little harm in admiring your friends or colleagues or in them admiring you, as long as it doesn&#8217;t get out of hand. Uncritical admiration is foolhardy, but the kind of admiration we feel for someone who&#8217;s doing things we think are worth doing is healthy, and can strengthen &#8211; rather than weaken &#8211; personal and professional relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/11/various-and-sundry/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 06:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.melchua.com/2008/04/11/various-and-sundry/#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Whoa, the sentences in this post are incredibly fragmented. I think I was continuously interrupting myself in the middle of sentences here. I need to remember that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_threads&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;green threading&lt;/a&gt; does not make coherent writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, the sentences in this post are incredibly fragmented. I think I was continuously interrupting myself in the middle of sentences here. I need to remember that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_threads" rel="nofollow">green threading</a> does not make coherent writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

