<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polyglot content on the OLPC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.melchua.com/2007/03/30/polyglot-content-on-the-olpc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2007/03/30/polyglot-content-on-the-olpc/</link>
	<description>Braindump of the Mel. Seek coherency and relevance at your own risk.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2007/03/30/polyglot-content-on-the-olpc/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.melchua.com/2007/03/30/polyglot-content-on-the-olpc/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Cool! I&#039;ve seen quadtrees (or quadtree-like objects) used in collision detection algorithms before, but had no idea they had a name. It would go a long way towards keeping the hierarchy from getting unbalanced.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I wonder whether any taxonomy of human knowledge can remain naturally balanced, though. Seems like information growth is a weirdly unpredictable organic thing that defies attempts to put it in boxes. Wikipedia is messy, but it works (and I think the messiness is a big part of why it works, but that&#039;s a different topic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! I&#8217;ve seen quadtrees (or quadtree-like objects) used in collision detection algorithms before, but had no idea they had a name. It would go a long way towards keeping the hierarchy from getting unbalanced.</p>
<p>I wonder whether any taxonomy of human knowledge can remain naturally balanced, though. Seems like information growth is a weirdly unpredictable organic thing that defies attempts to put it in boxes. Wikipedia is messy, but it works (and I think the messiness is a big part of why it works, but that&#8217;s a different topic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Rivard</title>
		<link>http://blog.melchua.com/2007/03/30/polyglot-content-on-the-olpc/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie Rivard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.melchua.com/2007/03/30/polyglot-content-on-the-olpc/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Okay, you could specify the format of the msgid and parse it to create a structural hierarchy, but... really, there must be a better way. Any ideas?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you *were* going to structure the msgid, you might want to use quad trees.  Which are really cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Okay, you could specify the format of the msgid and parse it to create a structural hierarchy, but&#8230; really, there must be a better way. Any ideas?</i></p>
<p>If you *were* going to structure the msgid, you might want to use quad trees.  Which are really cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
